Keeping the fringe element off the
premises has its own set of rules.
2005 Charles Trainor Jr.
In addition to the challenges of protecting and maintaining
interior spaces, some facility managers are also responsible
for securing exterior spaces that can sometimes span
hundreds of acres. Fortunately, there are some excellent
technologies that can help facility professionals
stay on top of the challenge presented by "the
great outdoors."
Protecting the perimeter of a large area can be extremely
costly and difficult. Hiring an adequate number of
security staff members may be cost prohibitive, and
even under the best circumstances, an intruder who
has nothing more than a good set of tools and the
patience to learn the security guard's watch routines
can easily gain entry. However, there is good news:
new technology can be leveraged for better perimeter
security with lower costs.
Exterior security is very different from interior
security. Inside a facility, the controlled environment
and physical barriers of walls and doors make it relatively
simple to control the flow of traffic and detect suspicious
intruders. But in the outdoors, changing weather,
roaming animals, and large, unpartitioned areas make
it extremely difficult to secure an area effectively.
These same challenges mean any intrusion detection
systems will never be absolutely perfect, but the
right technology will give facility professionals
far more security than traditional approaches and
manual methods.
For securing the perimeter (also known as the fence
line), the two most common approaches are to use sensors
on the fence itself or use in ground sensors. Fence
mounted devices tend to use either individual vibration
sensors mounted on the fence or a continuous cable-or
"ribbon"-that reacts to an intruder. Vibration
sensors are similar to those used in interior applications
that send an alert when the fence is moved or struck.
Ribbon devices detect movement or tampering (such
as when the fence is cut) by sensing the effect on
the cable. Some of these ribbon systems use metal
cabling that registers changes in continuity, capacitance,
or resistance. Others use fiber optic technology to
detect activity based on the affect these undesirable
actions have on the light waves inside the cable.
Ribbon and fiber optic systems have their own set
of advantages and disadvantages, and no single one
can be called the best. For example, the mounting
requirements, susceptibility to false alarms (due
to weather or animals), and other characteristics
are different for each system and need to be carefully
considered.
The other type of perimeter security device is in
ground sensors. These systems use the same principles
as fence-mounted sensors, with the addition of cables
or tubes buried just below the surface of the ground.
These tubes react to ground pressure or interference
with electrical fields.
What happens if there is no fence line to secure?
Many facility managers are in charge of areas that
are not fenced and frequently have wild animals that
roam the premises. These areas are especially difficult
to secure.
There are two main approaches to this challenge:
volumetric sensors and video sensors. Volumetric sensors
capture modifications in an area based on changes
in a detection field. The most common volumetric devices
are infrared sensors that detect light in this spectrum
(otherwise invisible to the naked eye). Active infrared
uses a transmitter and receiver and sets up a beam
of light between the two. Interference with this beam
triggers an alarm.
Passive infrared detects the heat from human bodies
by sensing a change from the temperature of the background.
Passive infrared does not need a receiver, so it can
scan a wider area than active infrared. Unfortunately,
when the outside temperature is almost equal to that
of a human body, these systems can have trouble distinguishing
people from scenery; larger animals can also trigger
false alarms. Other systems use radio signals or microwaves
rather than infrared but essentially use the same
basic concepts.
Video sensors use cameras that detect intruders by
comparing the image they see with established parameters.
The simplest (and oldest) type compares the current
scene with a stored scene and looks for differences.
When the system sees a change in the scene, it triggers
an alarm. This works successfully if an area is very
well controlled and nothing moves. However, an area
where there is movement (such as trees blowing in
the wind) may cause many false alarms.
In more dynamic areas, the latest video detection
systems can use sophisticated computer programs to
distinguish between movement that is normal for the
area and movement that is suspicious. The video image
is fed to a computer system that analyzes the specific
characteristics of the image and can recognize distinct
objects as they move through the scene. These systems
can recognize a person or vehicle moving through the
scene, and some can even distinguish between people
and animals.
Video cameras today are a far cry from what they
were just a few years ago. Today, cameras are affordable
and widely available, and they can use a wide variety
of spectrums including infrared, extremely low light,
and normal visible light. The range of lenses available
is staggering, and extremely powerful lenses allow
one camera to scan many acres.
No matter what your facility's grounds are like,
one of these new technologies should allow you to
keep your grounds secure without breaking the bank.
Condon, a Facility Technologist and former facility
manager, is one of the contributing authors for BOMI
Institute's revised Technologies In Facilities Management
textbook. He works for System Development Integration,
a Chicago, IL-based firm committed to improving the
performance, quality, and reliability of client business
through the use of technology.
Send your questions about this column to tcondon@sdichicago.com.