Maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) groups at many companies are facing a major challenge: toxic MRO master catalogs stuffed with incomplete data on replacement parts, a problem that drives up costs and creates large-scale problems for multiple corporate divisions.
To combat this problem, companies must engage in a comprehensive effort to standardize and enrich MRO data, adopt a sustainable MRO data-governance model, and develop a strategy for MRO lifecycle management, according to John Ferguson, certified maintenance and reliability professional for the IHS Supply Chain service at information and analytics provider IHS.
“Companies must recognize the importance of solid MRO foundational data, and they have to understand the correlation this has to other areas of their business,” Ferguson said. “Once they get the foundation right, other related goals or initiatives in operational excellence will be much easier. The lack of emphasis on MRO data quality results in inefficiency. Organizations waste an inordinate amount of time and resources in trying to make other pieces of the MRO lifecycle and maintenance and reliability work with master data that ranges from being poor quality to being downright ‘toxic.’”
Chain reaction. The problem of MRO inventories is massive, with stockpiles growing by 9% per year globally. Based on industry inventory data analysis, an estimated 55% of MRO inventories have not moved in the past three years—and 30% of MRO inventories that are currently in stock will never be used. Furthermore, 6% of MRO items make up 90% of the annual spend for companies in general.
However, the majority of reorder points as well as reorder quantities are incorrect, as are the lead times (see figure below). An estimated 62% of orders points are wrong—with 81% and 97% of order quantities and lead times being erroneous.
Crisis in a ball valve. Ferguson explains the inefficiency of conflicting MRO data by showing the varying product descriptions of a single MRO part: a ball valve.
“A toxic catalog of replacement parts can affect other business processes,” Ferguson said. “A classic example—using actual data from a client—shows a ball valve and six different ways it was described within their MRO master catalog. The same part had multiple records with different descriptions, part numbers, and prices. This left the client with duplicate, inconsistent descriptions, affecting its capability to search and access information, as well as to get a foundation in place for getting to a higher level MRO process.”
These types of catalog inconsistencies prevent companies from locating required parts for scheduled and unplanned maintenance work. When parts cannot be located, companies purchase excess parts, causing inventories to balloon.
To prevent such negative ramifications on operations—and to leverage MRO data in support of corporate wide initiatives that can improve efficiency—companies must put their MRO data into an accurate, consistent and structured format, free of duplicate parts.
Building the foundation. However, this process only serves as the basis of a set of other steps that companies must take to get engaged in MRO best practices. Following the process optimizing MRO data, companies must adopt a sustainable MRO data-governance model along with enabling technology that seamlessly integrates into their enterprise resource planning (ERP) and enterprise asset management (EAM) systems to dynamically synchronize their MRO data.
Next, companies should optimize MRO inventory. This can lead to more balanced inventory levels, and allow companies to conduct criticality analysis and make impact assessments.
Finally, companies need a systematic approach for classifying, managing, and optimizing all aspects of their MRO value chain, including MRO materials master catalog data management, strategic sourcing, procurement, critical spares identification, balanced inventories, asset dispositioning strategies, and inventory and storeroom best practices.
“Once you get your foundation solidified, then you can get into optimizing your inventory and looking at spend analysis, such as what your maximum cost level should be and what your orders should be based on your usage history,” Ferguson said. “You can also get into more advanced MRO practices and use the foundation you’ve put in place to support broader corporate initiatives, like maintenance excellence, procurement excellence, and other more efficient ways of doing business. “These actions all have positive aspects on the bottom line and shareholder value.
Other posts by