Studies Confirm Superior Sale, Rental, And Occupancy Rates for LEED, ENERGY STAR Buildings
In the NBI study, the results indicate that new buildings certified under the U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC) LEED certification system are, on average, performing 25% to 30% better than non-LEED certified buildings in terms of energy use. The study also demonstrates that there is a correlation between increasing levels of LEED certification and increased energy savings. Gold and Platinum LEED certified buildings have average energy savings approaching 50%.
To download a PDF of the study, click this link:
NIBS.pdf
Energy savings under EPA's ENERGY STAR program are equally impressive: buildings that have earned the ENERGY STAR label use an average of almost 40% less energy than average buildings, and emit 35% less carbon. But beyond the obvious implications of reduced energy use and reduced carbon emissions, the results from both studies strengthen the "business case" for green buildings as financially sound investments.
According to the CoStar study, LEED buildings command rent premiums of $11.24 per square foot over their non-LEED peers and have 3.8% higher occupancy. Rental rates in ENERGY STAR buildings represent a $2.38 per square foot premium over comparable non-ENERGY STAR buildings and have 3.6% higher occupancy. And, in a trend that could signal greater attention from institutional investors, ENERGY STAR buildings are selling for an average of $61 per square foot more than their peers, while LEED buildings command a remarkable $171 more per square foot.
The group analyzed more than 1,300 LEED Certified and ENERGY STAR buildings representing about 351 million square feet in CoStar’s commercial property database of roughly 44 billion square feet, and assessed those buildings against non-green properties with similar size, location, class, tenancy, and year-built characteristics to generate the results.
Labels: CoStar_Group, ENERGY_STAR, The_Environment, USGBC





3 Comments:
Hmmm...very fantastic yet suspicious claims packaged as a "study" of LEED and Energy Star buildings. However, a quick review of the opening page reveals that the report was funded by USGBC and EPA.
Forgive my skepticism (I haven't taken my SARCASMA today) but should we call this document:
a) a peer initiated "study"
b) an unbiased "report"
c) a "propoganda commercial" for the LEED & Energy Star programs?
Would this be like the Jewelers Association of America "studying" the importance of spending 2 year's salary on an engagement ring?
Sarcasmically Snarkingly Yours,
Poor Richard
By
Poor Richard, at Fri Apr 18, 01:37:00 PM EDT
Somehow, I knew you'd like this study, Poor Richard! I posted it just for you!
By
HeidiTFM, at Fri Apr 18, 01:49:00 PM EDT
My goal is to always meet or exceed your expectations!
PR
By
Poor Richard, at Fri Apr 18, 02:19:00 PM EDT
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home