The First Facility Management Blog


November 19th, 2008

Breaking News: Architecture Billings Index Drops to All Time Low

On the heels of a six-point drop in September, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) plummeted to its lowest level since the survey began in 1995. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI shows an approximate nine to 12 month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending.

The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the October ABI rating was 36.2, down significantly from the 41.4 mark in September (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The inquiries for new projects score was 39.9, also a historic low point.

“Until recently, the institutional sector had been somewhat insulated from the deteriorating conditions affecting the commercial and residential markets,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “Now we are seeing that governments and nonprofit agencies are having difficulties getting bonds approved to finance large scale education and healthcare facilities, furthering the weak conditions across the construction industry.”

Key October ABI highlights:
Regional averages: Northeast (44.3), South (40.0), Midwest (37.4), West (34.9)
Sector index breakdown: mixed practice (45.1), institutional (42.1), commercial / industrial (33.6), multi-family residential (34.2)
Project inquiries index: 39.9

The Architecture Billings Index is derived from a monthly “Work-on-the-Boards” survey and produced by the AIA Economics Market Research Group. Based on a comparison of data compiled since the survey’s inception in 1995 with figures from the Department of Commerce on Construction Put in Place, the findings amount to a leading economic indicator that provides an approximately nine to twelve month glimpse into the future of nonresidential construction activity. The diffusion indexes contained in the full report are derived from a monthly survey sent to a panel of AIA member-owned firms. Participants are asked whether their billings increased, decreased, or stayed the same in the month that just ended. According to the proportion of respondents choosing each option, a score is generated, which represents an index value for each month.

LABELS AIA, Architecture Billings Index, Construction Trends, Professional_Development No Comments »

October 22nd, 2008

Architecture Billings Index Falls More than Six Points

Following three consecutive months of signs of greater stability in design activity, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) fell precipitously, dropping more than six points. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI shows an approximate nine to 12 month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending.

The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the September ABI rating was 41.4, down sharply from the 47.6 mark in August (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The inquiries for new projects score was 51.0. This is also the first time in 2008 that the institutional sector has fallen below the 50 mark.

“With all of the anxiety and uncertainty in the credit market, the conditions are likely to get worse before they get better,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “Many architects are reporting that clients are delaying or canceling projects as a result of problems with project financing.”

Key September ABI highlights:
Regional averages: Midwest (45.2), West (45.0), Northeast (44.2), South (44.1)
Sector index breakdown: mixed practice (45.9), institutional (45.6), commercial / industrial (42.1), multi-family residential (40.3)
Project inquiries index: 51.0

LABELS AIA, Architecture_Billings_Index, Construction Trends, Economic_Downturn, Professional_Development Comments Off

September 22nd, 2008

Institutional Market Continues to be Lone Bright Spot in Non-Residential Sector

While conditions have improved somewhat for three consecutive months, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) continues to point to unfavorable conditions for the non-residential construction market. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI shows an approximate nine to 12 month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending.

The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the August ABI rating was 47.6, up slightly from the 46.8 mark in July (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The inquiries for new projects score was 52.4. There is, however, continued demand for projects such as schools, hospitals, and government buildings with the institutional category of the ABI remaining positive going all the way back to 2004.

“The recent figures over the last quarter are no real surprise given the overall state of the economy,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “The news for industries affected by the construction industry is that looking back 12 to 18 months, the numbers were extremely healthy. That means many of those projects are currently in or entering the construction phase so there should still be demand for labor and building materials, and later on interiors, computer equipment and the like.”

Key August ABI highlights:
Regional averages: Midwest (49.4), West (49.2), Northeast (45.2), South (45.0)
Sector index breakdown: institutional (52.2), commercial / industrial (47.5), mixed practice (44.8) multi-family residential (40.8)
Project inquiries index: 52.4

The Architecture Billings Index is derived from a monthly “Work-on-the-Boards” survey and produced by the AIA Economics Market Research Group. Based on a comparison of data compiled since the survey’s inception in 1995 with figures from the Department of Commerce on Construction Put in Place, the findings amount to a leading economic indicator that provides an approximately nine to 12 month glimpse into the future of non-residential construction activity.

The diffusion indexes contained in the full report are derived from a monthly survey sent to a panel of AIA member-owned firms. Participants are asked whether their billings increased, decreased, or stayed the same in the month that just ended. According to the proportion of respondents choosing each option, a score is generated, which represents an index value for each month.

LABELS AIA, Economic Trends, New Construction, Professional_Development, construction No Comments »

September 16th, 2008

Advanced Energy Design Guide Available For Free Download

Nine million tons of carbon dioxide. $600 million in energy costs: that’s the potential savings represented by 100,000 copies in the Advanced Energy Design Guide series now in circulation. More than 88,000 of the publications have been obtained via free download since January 2008.

The series includes publications on small retail and small office buildings, K-12 school buildings, and warehouses and self-storage units.  The books provide guidance on how to achieve 30% energy savings over building code minimums based on ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-1999.

Calculations show that if every guide downloaded resulted in a single building designed to save 30% beyond code minimum, the estimated energy and carbon savings would be 52 trillion btus and 9 million tons of carbon dioxide. With an average cost of electricity of 5¢ per kwh and gas at $7 per mmbtu, the estimated cost of energy savings is over $600 million.

The guides are developed by ASHRAE, the American Institute of Architects, the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, and the U.S. Green Building Council, with support from the U.S. Department of Energy.

“ASHRAE is committed to energy optimization and producing guidance that will help move the building industry toward market-viable net-zero energy and carbon neutral buildings,” ASHRAE President Kent Peterson, P.E., said. “The call for these high performing buildings is transforming our industry, and the guidance in the Advanced Energy Design Guide series is useable technology guidance to help owners, architects, and engineers in accomplishing high-performing buildings.”

“This is proof positive that there are substantial economic benefits to green building strategies,” said AIA President Marshall E. Purnell, FAIA.  “Hopefully this will help convince skeptics of the value and payback of green building design and that practitioners will take advantage of this excellent resource so that we can move closer to reaching our shared goal of carbon neutral buildings by 2030.”

Upcoming publications in the series include 30% guidance books for highway lodging, existing buildings, and small health care facilities.

LABELS AIA, ASHRAE, Energy, IESNA, USGBC No Comments »

July 17th, 2008

Bad News For Construction Forecasts

As the nonresidential sector has experienced cutbacks in demand for new space, the projections for construction activity for new nonresidential facilities are in for a mild decline in 2008, with a more significant downturn in 2009. The forecasts are more negative for commercial and industrial buildings, with an especially large drop-off in the office and retail sectors.

The two largest institutional categories, healthcare and education facilities, should see a slight increase this year and could help offset some of the losses in the other project categories. The continued increase in building material costs in recent years could also adversely affect the construction industry.

These are highlights from the American Institute of Architects (AIA) semi-annual Consensus Construction Forecast, a survey of the nation’s leading construction forecasters. The report is also calling for a 1.9% decline in inflation-adjusted activity in 2008, followed by a projected 6.7% decline in 2009.

“The more pessimistic forecasts this round stems from the lack of growth in the overall economy, the ripple effect from the faltering housing market, and the anxiety in the credit markets leading to a restriction in lending for all types of construction projects,” said AIA Chief Economist, Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “The one bit of good news is that this contraction in activity is likely to be considerably milder than the construction recessions of the early 1990s and earlier this decade.”

Market Segment Consensus Growth Forecasts:
Commercial/Industrial
Retail: -8.3% (2008) -9.9% (2009)
Office buildings: -3.7% (2008) -12.3% (2009)
Hotels: 6.6% (2008) -9.9% (2009)
Industrial facilities: 4.6% (2008) -5.5% (2009)

Institutional
Healthcare: 0.2% (2008) 1.1% (2009)
Education: 2.7% (2008) -1.1% (2009)
Amusement/Recreation: 3.6% (2008) -8.5% (2009)
Public Safety: 5.9% (2008) -1.9% (2009)
Religious: -11.7% (2008) -1.2% (2009)

Baker added, “Another key concern for the industry is that the cost of construction materials has increased more than twice that of consumer products and services – up 37% versus 18% since 2004. Petroleum-based materials and other key construction commodities such as steel, concrete and stone have experienced very sharp price increases in recent years.”

For the complete report, click this link.

LABELS AIA, Economic_Downturn, Kermit_Baker, New_Construction, Professional_Development No Comments »

July 14th, 2008

Exhibition on Transforming South Street Seaport To Be Launched by AIA New York

Compelling proposals to change the face of lower Manhattan will be on display at the Center for Architecture in New York. “South Street Seaport: Re-envisioning the Urban Edge”, is an exhibition from July 17 through September 20, 2008 that showcases 37 prospective designs resulting from the third Biennial Ideas Competition launched by the Emerging New York Architects Committee (ENYA) of the AIA NY. This competition encouraged participants to envision new connections, both material and metaphoric, to Manhattan’s contemporary urban fabric.

“South Street Seaport: Re-envisioning the Urban Edge” provided a rare opportunity for students and young professionals in the field of design and architecture, and who have completed their education at the undergraduate or graduate level within the past 10 years, to engage the ongoing evolution of the South Street Seaport.

Preserving waterfront history
Continuing its recent tradition of selecting sites tied to New York City’s waterfront, ENYA partnered with the Seaman’s Church Institute (SCI), whose headquarters have been in the Seaport neighborhood since 1832. With SCI functioning as a hypothetical client, participants were asked to consider the area’s past before suggesting interventions to its future.

Principal design elements of the contest included a community center for the SCI and gallery space to house their collection of maritime art and artifacts, as well as open space usage that would preserve the neighborhood’s intriguing history. Unlike previous competitions that have asked entrants to consider building on terra firma, this competition required the design of a new pier over the water south of the Brooklyn Bridge.

“ENYA’s Biennial Competition program provides an important opportunity for emerging architects from around the world to proffer their suggestions about what the future face of New York City might look like,” commented Carolyn Sponza, AIA, LEED AP, Vice President for Professional Development with the AIA New York Chapter. “As an ideas competition, many of the selections break the mold of traditional thinking about urbanism and engagement with the city—often resulting in proposals that tread the boundary between the accepted and radical.”

Global perspectives on the Seaport
The competition jury included highly influential designers and critics form New York, including Nina Baniahmad, Sara Caples-Jefferson, Kate Kerrigan, Eeva Liisa Pelkonen, Michael Sorkin and Calvin Tsao. The exhibition curators are Anne Leonhardt, Joel Melton, and Sean Rasmussen. Models of the four winning entries will be displayed along with the 37 proposals selected by the jury. More than 200 participants entered the competition, representing a broad spectrum of domestic and international architects, landscape architects, urban designers and planners, and graphic artists from 13 countries.

Opening party, walking tour and more
In addition to the opening on July 17, other events will include a symposium, walking tour, and lecture. The exhibition is accompanied by a publication that contains highlights of the best entries, critical essays by noted architectural writers on architecture Michael Sorkin and Ann Buttonwieser, and proposals by NYC high school students involved in an architectural design studio program.

LABELS AIA, ENYA, Exteriors, architecture No Comments »

May 1st, 2008

Architecture Billings Index Drops to Lowest Level Ever

Emblematic of the various struggling sectors in the overall economy, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) dropped two points in March and fell to its lowest level since the survey’s inception in 1995. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI shows an approximate nine to 12 month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending.

The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the March ABI rating dropped to 39.7, following its steep nine point decline in February (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The inquiries for new projects score was 48.0, also the lowest mark for the survey.

“We’ve seen an 11-point fall-off in the first quarter of the year, and the prognosis for commercial construction later this year is not favorable at this point,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “Aside from historically low project demand, all regions are showing very poor business conditions. This is not likely to reverse itself anytime soon.”

Key March ABI highlights:
Regional averages: South (45.3), Northeast (38.7), West (38.7), Midwest (36.9)
Sector index breakdown: institutional (50.8), commercial/industrial (38.3), multi-family residential (31.7)
Project inquiries index: 48.0

The Architecture Billings Index is derived from a monthly “Work-on-the-Boards” survey and produced by the AIA Economics Market Research Group. Based on a comparison of data compiled since the survey’s inception in 1995 with figures from the Department of Commerce on Construction Put in Place, the findings amount to a leading economic indicator that provides an approximately nine to 12 month glimpse into the future of nonresidential construction activity.

The diffusion indexes contained in the full report are derived from a monthly survey sent to a panel of AIA member-owned firms. Participants are asked whether their billings increased, decreased, or stayed the same in the month that just ended. According to the proportion of respondents choosing each option, a score is generated, which represents an index value for each month.

LABELS AIA, Architecture_Billings_Index, Economic_Downturn, Kermit_Baker, New Construction, Professional_Development, architecture No Comments »

January 28th, 2008

New Version of National CAD Standard Now Available

Last Thursday (1/24/08), the American Institute of Architects (AIA), Construction Specifications Institute (CSI), and National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) unveiled the United States National CAD Standard® (NCS) Version 4.0, the first update to the Standard since 2005. The latest edition, designed for owners, architects, engineers, contractors, facility managers, code officials, manufacturers, and suppliers, adds the following improvements to Version 3.1:
* Expanded and reorganized CAD Layer Guidelines make it easier to locate layer names, including new telecommunications and electrical discipline layer names.
* Updated Uniform Drawing System adds new and revised symbols for geotech, security, fire suppression, masonry, plaster and updates and clarifies common drawing practices.
* Completely re-written Plotting Guidelines reflect that line widths are no longer required to be mapped to color numbers.
* Version 4.0 now includes documents in PDF, Excel, and .dwg file formats, making it easier to search and integrate the standard into CAD, BIM, costing, and other software.

Walter Marlowe, CSI’s executive director said, “NCS Version 4.0 will further streamline design, construction, and facility operations communication among all participants in the facility life cycle. Better communication means fewer errors and lower costs for all disciplines.”

“A current, widely used National CAD Standard is an essential part of NIBS’ cooperative effort with AIA, CSI, and the buildingSMART Alliance to ensure an open, interoperable information format and communication environment—including integration into the new National Building Information Model Standard (NBIMS)—that will serve both the building community and the general public,” added NIBS President David A. Harris, FAIA.

NCS Version 4.0 will benefit a wide range of industry stakeholders:
* Owners and facility managers will benefit from a consistent appearance of drawing sets for all projects, reducing errors and change orders.
* Designers will spend less time creating and maintaining in-house office standards.
* Contractors will benefit from a consistent detail reference system.
* Code officials will benefit from the consistent location of regulatory information in the drawing set and on specific individual sheets.
* Manufacturers and suppliers will save time on price quotes and submittal review and approval.

The NCS incorporates three important components from the partnering organizations: AIA’s CAD Layer Guidelines; Modules 1-8 of CSI’s Uniform Drawing System; and NIBS’ Introduction, Appendices, and Plotting Guidelines (all maintained and balloted by the NIBS NCS Project Committee). Combining these resources, the NCS prescribes CAD layer names, drawing set organization, drafting, notation, and plotting conventions. It adds an extensive symbols library and thousands of terms and abbreviations.

Over 5,000 workplaces have voluntarily adopted the NCS since its debut in 1999. Many federal agencies require NCS use and many private sector users have adopted it, including auto manufacturers, international shipping companies, national retailers and financial service providers. The NCS helps building designers, constructors and operators coordinate their efforts by classifying electronic design data consistently, easing information retrieval. It improves communication among owners and project teams, cuts or eliminates costs of developing and maintaining company-specific standards, and reduces the expense of transferring building data from design applications to facility management applications.

LABELS AIA, CAD, CSI, NCS, NIBS, Standards, Technology No Comments »

December 11th, 2007

New Roofing Course Earns AIA Continuing Education Learning Unit

Polyglass® USA in conjunction with Ron Blank & Associates, Inc. has developed a continuing education program discussing the advantages of self-adhesive membranes over traditional roofing products.

Titled “Advances in Membrane Roofing,” the Web-based, self study course features a final exam that allows course takers to earn one Learning Unit under the Health, Safety & Welfare section of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) Continuing Education Program. Upon successful completion of the course, a certificate of completion will be sent to the test taker via email.

Topics to be addressed within the course include: the advantages of self adhesive membranes with advanced adhesive technology compared to conventional materials; new products based on advanced adhesive technology; and the latest trends and innovations in roofing material selection. As a manufacturer of SA self adhesive membranes using ADESO Technology, Polyglass is well established in the field of advanced adhesives.

LABELS AIA, Exteriors, Polyglass USA, Professional_Development, Ron Blank and Associates, roofing No Comments »

November 8th, 2007

AIA Releases 2007 Update to Contract Documents

Earlier this week (11/5/07), the American Institute of Architects (AIA) introduced its 2007 Update to AIA Contract Documents. The AIA prepared the 2007 Update, which consists primarily of agreements in the popular A201 family of documents, with input from owners, contractors, attorneys, architects, and engineers. The 2007 Update includes 40 revised, updated, or new documents, including new owner/architect agreements.

The AIA updates the A201 family on a 10 year cycle to reflect changes in industry trends and practices. The revision process began in 2004, when the AIA solicited industry feedback on the 1997 A201 family of documents from more than a dozen industry groups, including the Associated General Contractors, the Associated Specialty Contractors, the American Subcontractors Association, the Associated Builders and Contractors, the Council of American Structural Engineers, the National Association of State Facilities Administrators, the Commercial Owners Association of America, the American Council of Construction Lawyers, and attorneys from Division 2, and 12 of the American Bar Association’s Forum on the Construction Industry.

The AIA Documents Committee and AIA staff attorneys met with most of the industry groups while working to address their concerns, which included dispute resolution, financial matters, the right to obtain payment information, insurance, the architect’s standard of care, and sustainable design. The first drafts of the 2007 agreements were completed in 2005. The AIA sent the drafts out to the industry for review, made revisions to respond to the comments received, and sent out additional drafts in 2006 before finalizing the agreements for the November 2007 release.

“We are very grateful to the industry for candidly sharing hundreds of comments—these provided the feedback we needed to address all parties’ concerns,” said Suzanne Harness, managing director and counsel, AIA Contract Documents, American Institute of Architects. “AIA documents are the most respected and widely used in the design and construction industry. We think that’s because we provide a winning combination: agreements that fairly balance the interests of contracting parties, and easy-to-use software that delivers documents in Microsoft Word®.”

Significant changes were made to A201, the “backbone” of the A201 family of documents, because it forms the relationship between the owner, contractor, and architect.
Removal of Mandatory Arbitration – Parties are no longer required to resolve disputes through arbitration. The 2007 Update now offers arbitration as an option; however, if no option is specifically selected, the default procedure is litigation.

Consolidation of Arbitrations – New provisions allow for the architect and his or her consultants, the owner, the contractor, and subcontractors to participate in one multi-party arbitration, as long as certain conditions are met.

Initial Decision Maker – Previous versions of the documents assigned the architect the role of serving as a neutral party to decide disputes between the owner and contractor. The 2007 Update provides the owner and contractor with the opportunity to hire a third-party initial decision maker (IDM) for dispute resolution. The architect remains as the default, if an IDM is not identified in the contract.

Statute of Limitations – The revised A201 designates that the time limit for commencing claims is determined by state law; however, this time limit cannot be longer than ten years after substantial completion of the project.

Additional Insured Provisions – Project Management Protective Liability Insurance is deleted and substituted with a practice that has become common in the industry, naming the owner, architect and the architect’s consultants as additional insureds under the contractor’s general liability policy.

Right to Financial Information – The 2007 Update limits the contractor’s right to request financial information from the owner after work commences and events occur that would lead to concern about the owner’s ability to pay. The revisions also allow the owner a greater opportunity to learn of contractor/subcontractor payment problems, and address a contractor’s failure to pay a subcontractor by allowing the owner to write joint checks.

New Owner/Architect Agreements: The 2007 Update retires B141™–1997, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, and B151™–1997, Abbreviated Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, and merges their content to create B101™–2007, a one-part document for traditional design and construction contract administration services. B101–2007 returns to the concept of “basic” and “additional” services, clearly laying out the architect’s services during five phases:
Schematic design
Design development
Construction documents
Bidding/negotiations
Construction contract administration
B101 also requires the architect to discuss with the owner the use of environmentally responsible design approaches (sustainable design) in the project, and to incorporate approaches, such as building orientation and material choices, when creating the design. While the level of sustainable design that will be incorporated into the project is ultimately the owner’s decision, B101–2007 provides a platform for architects to introduce the option of environmentally responsible design to the owner.

The 2007 Update also includes two other new owner/architect agreements: B103™–2007, an owner/architect agreement for large, complex projects, and B104™–2007, for projects of a limited scope. These agreements follow the model B101–2007, but add to, or subtract from, B101’s terms to create agreements that are tailored to different project sizes. Both B101–2007 and B103–2007 incorporate A201–2007, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. B104–2007 incorporates A107™–2007, an owner/contractor agreement for a project of limited scope. A107–2007 is now modified for use with three types of payment: stipulated sum, cost-plus-a-fee, and cost-plus-a-fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).

New Numbering System: A noticeable change is the new numbering system, which provides consistency in document numbering and establishes a meaning for each number. While the documents maintain a letter to denote the agreement parties, the first letter indicates the type of agreement or form (e.g, prime or subcontract), the second number identifies the family, and the third number indicates sequence. For example, A141™ –2004, is a prime agreement in the design-build family and is the first document in the sequence.

Digital Practice Documents: E201™–2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, which allows parties to establish project-specific protocols for data transfer, and C106™–2007, Digital Data Licensing Agreement were introduced in early 2007. These documents allow parties to manage their digital data as the use of paper construction documents continues to decrease.

AIA Contract Documents are available in paper form and electronically in AIA Contract Documents software. The software generates customizable, Microsoft Word files. The existing 1997 documents will continue to be available until May 31, 2009 to allow contracting parties to transition to the 2007 versions.

AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at the following link.

LABELS A201, AIA, AIA Contract Documents, Architects, Professional_Development No Comments »