July 31st, 2007
Bulk Soap Contamination In Open Containers?
Despite the illusion of cleanliness, recent studies indicate that people could be putting their health at risk when using soap from open, refillable soap dispensers. Conducted by the University of Arizona under the direction of Dr. Charles P. Gerba, a professor of environmental microbiology in the departments of Microbiology and Immunology and Soil, Water, and Environmental Science at the University of Arizona in Tucson, the studies showed that approximately 23% to 25% of samples taken from open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispensers were contaminated with unsafe levels of bacteria. Coliforms, illness causing fecal-based organisms, were found in 16% to 22% of the samples.
“Every time you use soap from an open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispenser, you could be putting hundreds of millions of fecal bacteria on your hands, which is actually more than is in the toilet after you flush it,” says Gerba. In contrast, no bacterial contamination was found in soap dispensed from sealed systems. Gerba suspects the number of contaminants were higher due to the warmer environment in showers and sinks located in locker room areas.
The amount of contamination was higher in samples collected from health and fitness facilities. There, nearly 33 of random samples taken from open refillable soap dispensers were contaminated with unsafe levels of bacteria. In those tests, coliforms were found in 50% to 55% of the contaminated samples.
The findings from these studies were presented at a recent meeting of the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) in Toronto, Canada and at the National Environmental Health Association’s Annual Conference. The studies, which were funded in part by GOJO Industries of Akron, OH (inventors of PURELL® Instant Hand Sanitizer) concluded that the open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispensers are a breeding ground for germs and can result in a public health risk. Open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispensers utilize a refillable container from which product is dispensed. It is refilled by pouring soap into the container on an “as needed” basis.
“When we first learned about contamination issues regarding open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispensers, we wanted to collect data to determine if it was true,” said Joe Kanfer, chairman and chief executive officer of GOJO Industries. “The study by Dr. Gerba confirmed that contamination is present.”
According to Gerba, the bacteria that were found in overwhelming numbers were opportunistic pathogens. Opportunistic pathogens are capable of causing serious infections in young people and people who are immunocompromised. He explained that these infections can range from eye, skin, or respiratory infections.
Although young people and those who are immunocompromised are at greater risk of infection, Gerba says everyone is susceptible, especially people with abrasions or open cuts or wounds. He adds that by washing hands with contaminated soap, there is also the potential of spreading the germs each time another surface is touched.
While opportunistic pathogens predominated, Gerba did not rule out the existence of frank pathogens growing in these open refillable soap dispensers. Frank pathogens are unmistakable viruses, microorganisms, or other substances that can cause disease in everyone, including healthy individuals.
Gerba explained this study focused on the amount of bacteria in the systems. He noted that opportunistic pathogens that were predominate included Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Serratia.
“We don’t know all the different types of bacteria that can grow in the dispenser,” said Gerba. “There could be frank pathogens that make everybody ill. So, my thinking is why take a chance?” He urged further testing to determine and identify disease-causing frank pathogens that might be housed at lower levels in these open refillable dispensers.
Meanwhile, does the type of open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispensers make a difference with regard to contamination? Gerba said any open refillable dispenser, whether plastic or stainless steel, could be subject to contamination. He cautioned that stainless steel dispensers may lend a false sense of security.
“Stainless steel will not control microbial growth,” responded Gerba. “They are very easy surfaces to clean. But, they won’t control microbial growth.”
Although manufacturers of these systems offer cleaning instructions and some offer products which claim to clean and sanitize these types of systems, Gerba said he is unaware of any established protocol for cleaning and effective sanitizing of open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispensers. With regard to cleaning solutions that also claim to sanitize, Gerba suggested checking how well they work and how often system should be cleaned in order to maintain it in a sanitary manner.
According to Gerba, the only safe solution to the risks of using open refillable bulk soap reservoir dispensers is to use sealed systems. Sealed systems utilize refill cartridges that are sealed during the manufacturing process. These high capacity refills are used once and then discarded when empty. The studies showed that no pathogens were found in soap collected from sealed systems.
Gerba explained, “A sealed system is sealed at the factory during manufacturing where the bulk system is actually refilled at the facility. It (bulk soap) may actually be diluted with water and may be contaminated from the water and people putting their fingers in the soap. That doesn’t happen with a sealed system.”
After analyzing the data from the study, Gerba concluded “I think the industry that supplies bulk soap should promote the use of sealed containers and not reusable fillable containers.”





2 Responses to “Bulk Soap Contamination In Open Containers?”
The article in TFM about the cross contamination of bulk soap in open containers does not seem to match the findings reported below.
Keith Brown
Architect
KArchBrown@aol.com
From both the Detroit Free Press and the New York Times.
July 30, 2007
QUESTION: Does each member of the family need an individual bar of soap to prevent spreading germs, or should we switch to liquid soap?
ANSWER: Probably not, especially if the bar gets rinsed off between uses. A study published in 1988 in the journal Epidemiology and Infection concluded that washing even with contaminated bar soap is unlikely to transfer bacteria.
The study, done at the Dial Corp. Technical Center, said that while microorganisms had recently been isolated from used soap bars, the findings of a low risk of cross-contamination were in agreement with two studies using different methodology.
In the 1988 study, prewashed and softened commercial deodorant soap bars were inoculated with E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacteria at levels 70 times as high as those reported on used soap bars. Then, 16 people were told to wash their hands as usual with the inoculated bars.
“After washing, none of the 16 panelists had detectable levels of either test bacterium on their hands,” the researchers wrote. “These findings, along with other published reports, show that little hazard exists in routine hand-washing with previously used soap bars and support the frequent use of soap and water for hand-washing.”
From the New York Times News Services
************
Interesting confirmation of that which I learned in a microbiology class. Also interesting was intentionally placing several brands of so-called “Instant hand sanitizers” in media along with staph bacteria as well as e. coli, and after incubation discovering that none of the “sanitizers” came close to TOUCHING the bacteria. NOT ONE! And yet most of them claim to kill 99.9% of germs…
We’ve since rid our household of these so-called sanitizers, and will waste no more money on them.
WASH your hands, folks…short cuts don’t work, period!
Keith Allen Brown, August 3rd, 2007 at 12:18 pm
Good comments! That hand washing reiteration is the most common advice with both sanitizers and hand dryers (apparently some people don’t wash their hands at all)!
We appreciate the feedback. HeidiTFM (FacilityBlog editor)
HeidiTFM, FacilityBlog editor, August 3rd, 2007 at 12:42 pm
Leave a Reply