The First Facility Management Blog


April 25th, 2006

New Web site reveals the worst practices of America’s largest companies

Co-op America launched its new ResponsibleShopper.com Web site today to help consumers discover corporate America’s worst players and most destructive practices. The site profiles more than 150 major companies—including Wal-Mart, General Motors, Coca-Cola, and ExxonMobil—in nearly 25 industries. An all-in-one resource for ethical consumers, the Web site allows users to compare companies within an industry, write to companies to express their concerns, and find responsible alternatives that better reflect their values.

“A growing number of Americans are concerned about whether the companies they purchase from are responsible corporate citizens,” says Erin Gorman, Responsible Shopper program director. “Many large U.S. companies engage in practices that would alarm their customers if they knew about them. The new Responsible Shopper site gives consumers up-to-date information from around the globe about corporate labor, human rights, and environmental abuses, and helps people make smart choices about where to spend their dollars.”

Responsible Shopper looks at many of the companies that consumers purchase goods and services from regularly: including Adidas, Amazon.com, Colgate, Dell, Gap, Ford, General Mills, Kmart, McDonalds, Nike, Starbucks, Wendy’s, and Whole Foods.

Each month, Responsible Shopper will also post a snapshot of practices within a given industry, highlighting the best and the worst from a particular business sector and making recommendations for how consumers can most responsibly direct their purchases. The site kicks off by spotlighting the energy sector, focusing on coal companies in April and oil-and-gas companies in May. Future posts will focus on supermarkets, water bottlers, cosmetics manufacturers, and Internet service providers.

“We’re providing a snapshot of the global impact that businesses have on human rights, the environment, trade inequity, and more,” says Niki Lagos, lead researcher for Responsible Shopper. “Plus, we’ll connect shoppers with ongoing consumer campaigns—organized by Co-op America and other nonprofits—that are working to change irresponsible practices at problem companies.”

The site’s search function lets concerned consumers quickly and easily find information about specific businesses. A new feature called the “Green Shift,” offers additional tips on how to avoid problem companies and shift toward businesses whose practices benefit people and the planet.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 25th, 2006

Asbestos on the Hill

This article comes from Jackie Kucinich, and it was posted on The Hill.

Asbestos, apparently from crumbling underground utility tunnels, has been discovered near an entrance to the tunnels inside the Government Printing Office (GPO) building. GPO safety inspectors found “material containing asbestos” on a conveyer belt, a GPO spokeswoman said. Tests confirmed that the substance was 10% asbestos.

The discovery, made in February but hitherto unreported, appears to confirm fears that exposure to the carcinogenic substance has not been confined to tunnel workers but has leaked out of the underground passages and into areas where other others work.

The Architect of the Capitol (AoC) is the office responsible for management and maintenance of the tunnels, as well as the congressional office buildings and the Capitol. A source close to the discovery, who requested anonymity, said the AoC instructed the tunnel crew to stay away from GPO property after the asbestos was found, limiting access to equipment necessary for tunnel functions.

Officials at the Office of Compliance (OoC), which ensures that legislative-branch agencies follow federal safety and health standards, have expressed concern that asbestos could appear in other public areas. James Abbott, deputy general counsel for the OoC, said, “We are concerned about that and are testing.”

To read the rest of the story, click here.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 25th, 2006

I scream, you scream…


Ok, so it’s only indirectly work related as an interesting exercise in positive corporate/customer relations. Yes, Ben & Jerry’s has declared today (April 25) “Free Cone Day” at participating retail outlets.

Here are the details, right from the Ben & Jerry’s Web site:

Tuesday, April 25th is Free Cone Day at Ben & Jerry’s, and you know what that means… free ice cream for you!

As a way to thank our customers for their support and to celebrate 28 years of scooping the chunkiest, funkiest ice cream, frozen yogurt and sorbet, Ben & Jerry’s scoop shops are giving it away!

Around the world, scoop shops are opening their doors from noon to 8:00 pm, to serve up a free scoop of your favorite flavor (or better yet, a new one you’ve been wanting to try, like Turtle Soup™, Peanut Butter Swirl or Lemonade Sorbet).

So grab a pal and come on down to have some ’scream on us!
Like we said… Oh Happy Day!

Who ever said there’s no such thing as a free lunch? There is today, if you like ice cream!

P.S.–no ice cream for this Blogger, thanks. I’m allergic to dairy.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 24th, 2006

EPA’s ENERGY STAR® and BOMA Showcase Energy Efficiency

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) International are pleased to announce their partnership to present The BOMA Green Pavilion and ENERGY STAR® Showcase at The Office Building Show, June 25-27, 2006, in Dallas, TX. The showcase will match suppliers of environmentally friendly and energy-efficient products with the powerful commercial real estate industry leaders who are dedicated to embracing energy-efficient and green initiatives.

The market for environmentally friendly and energy-efficient products has taken off. “Considering rising energy costs, federal tax incentives, and municipal and state mandates, more and more BOMA members have committed to purchasing ‘green’ and energy-efficient building upgrades,” explained BOMA International Chairman and Chief Elected Officer, David W. Hewett, CCIM, CPM, RPA, CFM, FMA, principal of Trammell Crow Company. “As this specialized market grows, BOMA’s partnership with the EPA’s ENERGY STAR program will make The BOMA Green Pavilion and ENERGY STAR Showcase the most valuable resource of its kind—to both vendors with certified products and building owners and managers in need of those products.”

“On average, energy represents 30% of an office building’s operating costs. It is also a property’s single largest and most controllable operating expense,” says Stuart Brodsky, national program manager, commercial property markets of ENERGY STAR. “ENERGY STAR provides the information and resources building owners and managers need to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions while cutting operating costs. By partnering with BOMA, we are creating a forum to bring the best practices of ENERGY STAR partners together with commercial real estate’s decision-makers at The Office Building Show.”

The Office Building Show (June 25-27, 2006 at the Dallas Convention Center) runs in conjunction with The BOMA International Commercial Real Estate Congress. BOMA will co-locate with Realcomm, the industry’s leading technology event. Offering in-depth education and two exhibit areas featuring the industry’s most innovative products and services, the two events will attract more than 6,000 top commercial real estate professionals.

Founded in 1907, the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) International is a dynamic international federation of more than 100 local associations. The 19,000-plus members of BOMA International own or manage more than 9 billion square feet of downtown and suburban commercial properties and facilities in the U.S. and abroad. BOMA’s mission is to enhance the human, intellectual and physical assets of the commercial real estate industry through advocacy, education, research, standards and information.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 24th, 2006

InfoComm Certifies 4,500 AV Professionals

More than 4,500 experts in the audiovisual industry have achieved the designation of Certified Technology Specialist (CTS) from InfoComm International. The CTS program is the only professional AV certification program recognized by the National Certification Commission.

“Recent industry studies reveal that one of the few obstacles to explosive growth in the AV industry is access to a trained workforce,” says Randal A. Lemke, Ph.D., executive director, InfoComm International. “By enrolling employees in the CTS program, companies are making an important investment in quality – a decision that will pay off exponentially with more satisfied customers and fewer complaints. It is this commitment to Quality First that will keep our industry thriving and innovative.”

The CTS designation is for AV professionals who have demonstrated knowledge of the science and technology used in communications including audio, video, display and systems. Technicians, engineers, designers, salespeople, customer service personnel, managers and executives are eligible for taking the general certification testing.

More advanced certifications in design and installation, known as CTS-D or CTS-I, are also available. These require at least two years industry experience and a higher skill level than the general CTS designation. Although no specific courses are required for certification, InfoComm International offers courses through InfoComm Academy that can help candidates focus and refine their skills and knowledge. Testing for specialized certification is offered throughout the year.

A special designation of Certified Audio Visual Service Provider (CAVSP) is awarded to organizations who have demonstrated a commitment to quality based on the percentage of certified employees. Companies can achieve General, Silver or Gold CAVSP levels based on the proportion of their technical sales and customer service personnel who earn General or Specialized individual certification.

“Achieving and maintaining an educated and CTS- certified staff allows our company to be listed as a Certified Audio Visual Service Provider,” says Jim Smith, CTS, director of strategic initiatives, HB Communications and chairman of InfoComm’s Sound Audio Visual and Video Integrators Council. “This company CAVSP credential shows our customers that HB is dedicated to developing and maintaining the skills needed to service their needs. Harold R. McAlindon said that ‘The quality of an organization can never exceed the quality of the minds that make it up.’ Education and CTS certification are, therefore, critical to our quality control program.”

CTS testing and preparation classes will be offered throughout the year in various locations, including InfoComm ’06, being held June 3-9 at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, FL.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 24th, 2006

Course Created to Help Employers Prepare for Electronic Discovery Rules

Interactive Employment Training Inc. (IET) and LitigationProofing, LLC have released Think Before You Send: A Practical Guide to E-Mail in the Workplace. The course helps employees avoid the e-mail miscues that may lead to financial losses, bruised reputations, and employment terminations. The course was authored by three nationally recognized litigators who believe e-mail risk management is now a necessity.

The online training course comes at a critical juncture. Under new electronic discovery rules–approved April 12 by the U.S. Supreme Court–millions of e-mails will routinely be analyzed by lawyers seeking ammunition in court battles.

“As an employment lawyer, I have witnessed firsthand what can happen when employees click ‘send’ without thinking. We built this course because workplace e-mail servers are now transparent in litigation and inappropriate e-mails will become discovered on a more frequent basis. Good corporate governance now mandates training employees about the appropriate use of e-mail,” says Robert D. Lipman, Esq., president of IET.

In about 35 minutes, the course teaches the importance of regarding each e-mail as a permanent document and then presents compelling scenarios of common mistakes such as inappropriate personal use of corporate systems and ill-advised attempts at humor over difficult business decisions. “No senior executive with responsibility for litigation risk avoidance should pass up the opportunity to deliver this education to all employees who have access to company e-mail,” says former Merrill Lynch litigation manager and president of LitigationProofing, LLC, Eric M. Rosenberg, Esq.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 21st, 2006

Friday Funny: This is what happens when you get caught goofing around at work

This poor woman needs to spend more time working and less time playing computer games. See for yourself what happens to her.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 20th, 2006

Free software, training, and consulting for k-12 participants in roofing study

Digital Facilities Corporation (DFC) has announced it will conduct a two-year study of K-12 schools throughout North America to determine which roof management processes potentially yield the biggest return on investment of time and resources. The study will focus specifically on methods to improve the processes schools can use to improve the collection and management of roof condition information to allocate repair dollars and replacement capital to extend roofing life cycles.

Benefits to Participants
Selected participants of the study will receive a no-charge user license for DFC’s RoofPro 4.1 asset management software (valued at $4,950), as well as four hours of individual online training on using the software. RoofPro 4.1 features an organized database system, roof maintenance program, high quality report generators, and an optional roof condition rating system. Participants may also be considered for beta releases of roof inspection software to test in their district.

In addition to the RoofPro software and training, participants will also receive up to eight hours of consulting to improve the organization of their roofing organization, and access to a restricted pilot project web site, where they can share information on roof management.

“We are targeting schools because we know how important it is for them to keep costs down on repairing and replacing their roofs,” says Steven James, president of Digital Facilities Corporation. “We hope that this study will identify the software tools and processes that can help them collect, store and access information on the roofs that will enable them to make cost-effective decisions regarding their roofing assets.”

Participation Requirements
Selected participants will be asked to establish and maintain a minimum database of 10 buildings or 30 roof sections. They will also need to have working computer hardware that meets the minimum requirements for RoofPro, and pay a $750 annual maintenance fee during each year of the two-year course of the study. This fee includes software updates and unlimited technical support. In addition, participants will be asked to participate in online meeting forums to share findings and contribute non-detailed statistics to help establish key roof management findings that will be used in a published post study summary.

School facility managers or other authorized personnel interested in participating in the study should contact DFC at 905-844-3300 and ask for Mike Sievers.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 20th, 2006

WEB EXCLUSIVE: Why is safety important to a building owner

This Web exclusive comes from Jim Emmons, Safety Director of Structural Group, based in Baltimore, MD.

Today’s owners face a variety of risks when they undertake a construction project. Not only must owners be concerned with potential risks to their employees, tenants, or property, but they must also be concerned about the risks that the contractor bears. Safety is a critical item on all construction projects for multiple reasons including protecting the welfare of employees, providing a safe work environment, and controlling construction costs. However, the importance of safety as a cost controlling measure is often overlooked by owners and contractors. As a means of reducing the risks associated with construction, safety can significantly impact the overall cost. A dedicated commitment to safety by both the owner and contractor helps ensure project success and can impact the bottom-line considerably.

Owners should understand that all of the contractor’s risks, or even the threat of them, will either add considerable cost to the contract or decrease the potential profit a contractor is able to make on any specific contract. Since every contractor is in business to bring profit to the bottom-line, overhead would naturally take into consideration the “costs of doing business.” Expected losses have to be taken into consideration and included in the estimate if the contractor wants to stay in business.

How Safety Works to the Owner’s Benefit
Contrary to common perception, there is little up-front cost to the owner for implementing and maintaining the safety programs required since the contractor is already mandated by law to comply with local, state and federal regulations. To take advantage of this safety benefit, all the owner has to do is demand that the contractor document and implement the proper safety programs that will protect employees working on the job site.

To avoid the high dollar losses caused by injuries, contractors are required to implement various safety procedures like fall protection, hazcom, respiratory protection, confined space entry, competent person and other programs that control the causes of injuries. If the contractor is successful in preventing these injuries, overhead costs of insurance and hidden costs of accidents are significantly reduced, bringing more profit dollars back to the contractor. Hidden costs of an accident are four to 10 times the actual costs of the claim and account for items such as employee replacement costs, OSHA citations, loss of use, increased insurance costs, damaged product, etc. The direct costs of accidents only include items such as doctors, ambulance, indemnity, as well as prescription and medication costs.

Therefore, if the contractor has a great workers’ compensation safety record, the firm is more efficient in reducing risks, more profitable, has more on-time completion of contracts, less rework and is in effect, actively working to reduce the construction risks to the owner of the project. Owners who want to recognize the advantage a good contractor’s safety program can bring to a project should hire and demand contractors that actively and successfully control their risks through comprehensive safety programs.

How Owners Can Work with the Contractor
Owners sometimes hesitate and feel that they are interfering with the contractor’s way of doing business if they express concerns over safety at a jobsite. In reality, owners have the absolute right to mandate that a good quality safety program be an important part of the selected contractor’s culture. The contract documents are a very effective tool in conveying the owner’s safety requirements to the contractor. In addition, there are many benefits to pre-qualifying a contractor by comparing the firm’s safety record and other company statistics with the competition. A contractor with a good safety program is often a better choice even if the initial bid package is higher than the firm’s competitors. Poor safety compliance increases the owner’s risks and often inflates the final costs of a completed contract, and it is the final costs that need to be factored into this decision making process.

It is important for owners to take charge of the project and start viewing the contractor as a partner in the construction process. After all, the owner needs to have the project completed and the contractor needs the work. Neither one can be successful without the other. Although it takes a little more effort for the owner to become part of the process, his or her involvement is rewarded with a smooth-running, low stress, on-time and on-budget project. Without participation in the process, the owner is passively giving control to the contractor. There tends to be greater risks and the owner will often spend more time struggling to cope with the challenges rather than ensuring that his or her expectations are being met. Significant dollars are at stake during construction projects, and owners can either choose to control risks or let the contractors add money to their contracted price to cover the ultimate or expected losses.

How a Safety Program Controls the Owner’s Risks: Cost savings of safety vs. non safety
The process of preventing employee injuries and illnesses itself makes the contractor more efficient and effective with projects. The pressure to cut corners, skimp on materials, reduce quality, or rush to get the project completed is significantly reduced through compliance to a good, jobsite safety program.

There are many components of a good safety program, depending on the type of project that is undertaken. To be effective, most programs should have the following components:
1. Pre-project Planning (PrePP) is the simple process of getting the leadership team together to discuss how the project will be carried out in accordance with the contract. Every phase of the project and corresponding tasks are examined including project overview, contracts, internal organization, schedule management, task planning, resource management, material/supplies, cost management, budget/production, cash flow management, risk management, safety, subcontractor management and responsible individual list.

A contractor that plans work in this manner is more likely to perform the contract to the owner’s expectations, particularly if the owner is actively engaged with the contractor as a joint venture partner in the project. This joint venture relationship also helps the contractor become very responsive to the needs of the owner.

Safety is planned into the job as an integral part of the operation rather than something that is used only when it is necessary. This reduces the “shoot from the hip” decision making process and replaces it through the implementation of planning. For example, if a public risk is identified, a plan is developed for the protection of the people using the facility. The plan would include tools, materials and labor costs as well as the design, engineering and scope required to install the proper protection. Getting on-time deliveries of the materials, tools and other equipment needed to build the protection is also improved because of effective planning.

The alternative to planning is just waiting to see what kind of innovative protection is erected, if any, and how effective the minimal protection is going to be. Further, the cost associated with the protection will probably exceed the estimate – assuming that an estimate for this cost was done in the first place.

Simply, pre-project planning reduces the owner’s risks because the contractor, working with the owner’s involvement, will consistently complete the project on schedule, on budget and with the quality anticipated. The contractor is also rewarded because jobs that are pre-planned are consistently completed with greater than expected profitability, fewer, less severe injuries and greatly reduced hidden costs of incidents.

2. Pre-task Planning (PreTP) is simply engaging the employees who are going to do the
work. Conducting the pre-project planning generates a tremendous amount of critical information. To make the investment work effectively, additional planning sessions with the workforce may need to be completed. This is where the site specific safety program is developed and various types of training programs are selected based on the specific tools, materials, access, tasks and equipment that will be used to build this project. Further, this planning sets the expectations for the whole job. The owner is typically invited to participate with this process and often contributes critical information directly to the people who will do the work.

3. Setting and Monitoring Safety Goals for the project is really directed at how well safety is actively controlled on the project. This is usually completed in two ways: measuring results and measuring activities.

Results are usually measured by tracking the various OSHA Recordable Incident frequencies rates. There are three calculations that are typically used:

1. # of OSHA Rec. Inc. X 200,000/# of man hours worked = # of Rec. inj./100 full-time employees/YR

2. # of Lost work day cases X 200,000/# of man hours worked = # of Lost work day cases/100 full-time employees/Yr

3. # of Lost work days X 200,000/# of man hours worked = # of Lost work days /100 full-time employees/YR

Unfortunately, these OSHA measurements are after-the-fact and are not as effective as they could be since they are reactive. A more effective measurement would be to monitor safety activities that have been put in place to prevent injuries. Participation in the morning Job Safety Analysis (JSA), conducting Manager Safety Audits (MSA), keeping up with the Assured Grounding program or some other safety function will work for this type of measurement. Although effective, it will take more time and effort to tract them, which could add to the overall cost of maintaining the program.

4. Claims Management Programs which include detailed management directives, drug testing and return to work procedures are an excellent indication of the contractor’s safety culture. Having a clear motto like “Treat first and ask questions later” is an insight into how the contractor works with employees and their workers’ compensation claims.

Claims management is clearly a reactive program that is a very positive way to control the cost of a claim while protecting people. A good claims management program will also include WC Incident and Near Miss Incident investigations as a mandatory part of the process. These programs are both very proactive and will prevent future incidents by looking at the root causes of the incident. The Near Miss Incident review is probably the most proactive since this allows you to prevent accidents before they can happen.

5. Accountability, Responsibility and Authority for Safety. In order to develop a safety culture, the contractor must first hold employees responsible and accountable for safety. This means that all employees, not just a select group, have their annual compensation measured and indexed to the success of the company to meet its safety goals.

In addition, the annual review process should have a safety component that the contractor’s employees can be measured against. Any merit, wage or salary increases should be heavily weighted on the employee’s ability to meet these specific safety measurements, which could include the OSHA Recordable Frequency rates or some other proactive, measurable safety activity or criteria that can be applied to this process.

Probably the most important aspect of safety is that all employees should be given the authority to carry out safety. Anyone has a right to shut down an operation if there are known safety hazards that have not been addressed and the company will back-up and address the safety issues these employees have identified.

Finally, having a good safety culture must be considered a “Condition of Employment.” A contractor with a good safety culture not only requires safety but demands that all employees “Live it, Breath it.” Just saying that they have a safety culture isn’t good enough without all the employees actively working to make safety an integral part of the job process.

6. Formal Safety Program with a Working Field Safety Manual
A good safety program requires written procedures, specifications and engineering that documents safety requirements and details how employees will work to a specific standard of safety. This program should also be behavior-based since it has been shown that approximately 96 percent of all hazards are related to the unsafe acts of people while only 4% are due to unsafe conditions.

With a great deal of the construction work force being Hispanic, safety manuals need to convey information in a manner that will promote understanding of complex ideas. Pictures and demonstrations of work tasks are often more effective than written documentation. Having the information translated in both English ad Spanish is also important if the contractor truly intends for the program to be understood by all employees in today’s diversified workforce.

Unfortunately, there are many companies that produce safety manuals that are designed to only meet OSHA requirements and don’t consider all the necessary elements of a safety program. Equally problematic, many contractors simply purchase these safety manuals and never intend to use them in the field.

There is nothing more important to an owner than selecting a contractor that has a field safety manual that is user-friendly, applicable for the project being done and available to the employees that are most effected by unsafe behaviors and conditions found in the work place. Project managers, engineers and general superintendents are seldom affected in the same way as the laborers doing the work. A manual that can only be read by a small percentage of the people exposed to the hazards is ineffective and should be replaced by a guide that can be used by all employees.

7. Safety Training Program
Safety training is often a good measure of a contractor’s ability to establish and maintain a safety program. The willingness of management to spend the time and money it takes to do the training upfront reflects the importance safety is given in the work that is going to occur.

Training is how management expectations for safety can be effectively conveyed to their employees. Employees will receive the positive messages through leadership participation in the training. Although training must include the OSHA required safety information, there are many other things that should also be included in the program to have positive effects. Pre-task planning goes into the actual work task risks and the corrective actions that will prevent the risks from manifesting on the jobsite.

In order to improve comprehension, it is better to give demonstrations that allow the employees to participate in the process. There are four general steps for training to be successful.

1) Prepare the employee for the work he/she is about to perform.
2) Present the job through demonstration and detailed explanations.
3) Involve the employee with actual hands-on experience.
4) Follow-up by letting the employee do the work while still being available for questions and feed back as to the safety and quality of the work.

Once focused on safety requirements, the crew becomes more productive, efficient, effective, safer and aware of the risks associated with the jobsite. This in turn makes the contractor more profitable and able to meet the cost, production and safety expectations of the owner.

By participating in, or at least ensuring that the contractor is actively training employees, the owner is helping to reduce his/her risks and create a more positive and safe work place. Another method that owners can use to keep construction costs to a minimum is to select contractors with this training capability.

How to Find a Contractor with a Good Safety Culture?
The best way for an owner to become involved in the process and locate contractors with good safety programs is to implement a pre-qualification or screening process. This is accomplished by looking at the contractor’s past safety history (experience modification rate). Review the following for the past three years: OSHA Recordable Rates, Lost Work Day Case Rate, and the Lost Work Day Rate. Also be sure to review the contractor’s current safety history and obtain references from past clients. Further, there are many other ways that an owner can determine the contractor’s ability to control safety. For example, ask questions that deal with the specific nature of the work that is planned, the capacity of the contractor to do the work and experience with the type of work being performed. Many companies will request the contractor’s organization chart to see that the necessary leadership structure is there to support an active safety culture.

A great reference for additional safety information and ways to control safety on your jobsite is a book called Construction Safety Management by Raymond Elliot Levitt & Nancy Morse Samelson.

The Bottom Line

In order to reduce overall construction costs, decrease the time for completion and improve the quality of the job, owners have learned that it is important to take an active role in the contractor’s safety and training programs. Examining the contractor’s current and past safety performance history allows an owner to see how successful the contractor has truly been with their safety and health programs.

A safe contractor wins because he/she understands safety effects the successful completion of the contract and adds to bottom-line profits. Insured losses as well as the hidden costs of accidents are significantly reduced, which also continues to add to the bottom-line. The added bonus is a reduction in the contractor’s worker’s compensation, auto and general liability premium rates charged by the firm’s insurance carrier. The owner wins because his/her involvement helps to promote quality workmanship, prevent third-party lawsuits, and reduce general liability and property damage claims that would otherwise inflate the overall costs of the contract.

Perhaps the most beneficial aspects of owners and contractors working together with a joint venture safety program is that it provides for the safety, health and well being of the owners’ clients, employees and other people who live and work in or around the project. What a great way to give back to the community.

Emmons is the Safety Director for Structural Group (Baltimore, Maryland) where he plays a critical role in the development and implementation of the company’s safety program. Emmons travels extensively throughout the country working with various project teams and branch offices to plan projects and provide industry and job specific training programs. He also has presented to industry groups nationwide and authored a book entitled d, “A Field Guide to Better Safety,” which is used as a reference manual on all Structural Group jobsites. He can be reached at jemmons@structural.net.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »

April 19th, 2006

10 Addenda Proposed to ASHRAE Energy Standard

Fan power limitation requirements for complex HVAC systems, such as those in hospitals and laboratories, would be improved under a proposed change to ASHRAE’s energy standard. Eight proposed addenda to ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, are open for public comment until May 1.

“The standard would more effectively address static pressure associated with complex HVAC systems requiring specialized equipment in return air or exhaust air systems, such as those in hospitals,” says Larry Kouma, who heads the group that oversaw the proposed addendum.

“Appropriate allowances for discharge and return air flow treatment equipment would be allowed, enabling a clear avenue for these systems to demonstrate compliance using the prescriptive compliance methods of the standard. Or, if required, users can still use the standard’s energy cost budget method.”

The addendum also improves compliance consistency and strengthens stringency for simple systems with an easy-to-use format and structure;

Other proposed addenda open for comment until May 1 are:
• Addendum aa adds definitions for lighting related terms;
• Addendum ab clarifies which sections should be referenced in Section 11 and Appendix G;
• Addendum ae changes Section 11 and Appendix G to clarify the way lighting power is to be modeled;
• Addendum ai revises the lighting power requirements to eliminate confusion;
• Addendum aj adds the ASTM test method E 1980 – Standard Practice for Calculating Solar Reflectance Index of Horizontal and Low Sloped Opaque Surfaces;
• Addendum al clarifies the terminology for metal building roofs and the required assembly U-factors for such roofs;
• Addendum am allows minimum variable air volume turndown to be limited by the minimum ventilation requirement for a zone.

To obtain drafts of, or comment on, proposed addenda aa, ab, ac, ae, ag, ah, ai, aj, al and am visit www.ashrae.org/standards.

The standard provides minimum requirements for the energy-efficient design of buildings except low-rise residential buildings.

LABELS Uncategorized No Comments »