FM Issue: Power Reliability For Facility Managers

Posted on:

By Frank Healy Published in the July 2012 issue of Today’s Facility Manager

In the past, facility managers (fms) were able to judge the state of electrical power quality in their facilities based on whether the lights were on or not. If the lights were on, then the power quality was good and everyone was happy. If the lights were off and the occupants were complaining, then the power quality was bad. The second biggest concern fms have related to electrical power is how much it costs to keep the facility running. To that end, any opportunity to reduce energy consumption is considered an opportunity to improve efficiency. The typical approach to reducing energy consumption is to upgrade equipment to more energy efficient models and to reduce energy usage patterns by staff and operations. What’s harder to identify, and what frequently gets lost in the hubbub, is the potential efficiency gain of improving power reliability and preventing the lights from ever going off. Many fms may think if it’s not an (apparent) problem now, why address it?

Identifying Reliability Issues

Thankfully, the potential causes of power reliability issues are well known and relatively easy to identify. An fm and an electrical team can determine the level of risk they likely face compared to the level of risk they are comfortable with, and with some measurement data, they can make the best maintenance decision for the organization’s bottom line. Top power reliability issues for facilities include the following: Unmanaged moves, adds, and changes (MACs). Changes in business occasionally require equipment reorganization, from installing new servers to adding new lighting as part of an office reconfiguration. These seemingly mundane actions can actually impact the overall electrical system. Equipment interactions and upgrades. Sometimes when different electrical equipment operates together, it can create unanticipated problems. Common examples of this include installation of new, high efficiency lighting or electronic drives alongside older pieces of equipment. Backup power. Does the original system design still offer continuous operation? And does it engage properly when needed? For critical systems, regular testing is essential. Reliability in older facilities. When older facilities were first built, the only electrical equipment they typically contained was lighting, elevators, and water pumps. Unless the facility underwent a comprehensive retrofit, the hodgepodge of upgrades since that time was likely to set up conflicts between electrical system availability, capacity, and operational requirements. The next upgrade an fm makes could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. Effective electrical system management. By using some very basic techniques, it is possible for fms to maximize uptime and virtually eliminate the routine power quality problems that can have an impact on facilities that are not properly managed.

MAC Attacks

Employee needs inevitably change: whether it’s the new medical diagnostic machine; the energy efficient motors and drives; or building cubes for new staff members. If the electrical department or contractor learn about changes late in the game, they can feel time pressure to complete the setup and may not assess the current state before implementing the change. Often, everything seems to be working fine, but then the complaint comes in that the new equipment keeps switching off or malfunctioning. Typically, this is caused by marginal circuit overloads or disruption from electrically noisy loads on the same circuit as sensitive equipment. So what viable options are available to fms?
  • Identify changes on the overall electrical system and have electricians assess whether the malfunction is due to the electrical system or the equipment itself.
  • Improve communication between requestors and the electrical service group and allow more time for proper setup.
  • Have the electrical service group follow electrical codes, including the guidelines in article 220-35 of the National Electric Code regarding performing load studies to assess circuit capacity before adding new electrical loads.

The Ripple Effect

Different types of electrical equipment require different amounts of power at different levels of purity and can output corrupted power back into the system. But conflicts between these different types may only arise when they operate at the same time—at other times during the day, everything runs smoothly. Common symptoms of equipment conflict include breakers tripping, problems at a certain time of day, and random (seemingly) equipment resets. Without knowing that a conflict between systems or equipment is at fault, the electrician may never actually find the root cause of such an intermittent occurrence and may blame the utility instead. Managers should imagine a large facility with motors and pumps supporting the HVAC system, all controlled by automation. The automation takes in low voltage control signals from sensors (temperatures, speeds, pressures) and calculates outputs or control signals that go to the motors and pumps. As most fms know, those low voltage signals are very sensitive and can be interfered with by the large current drawn by the larger equipment nearby. If they do get interrupted, the control system may misinterpret the signals and provide the wrong directions back to the motor. In other cases, problems arise from harmonics generated by electronic loads such as electronic drives, energy efficient lighting, UPS systems, and computing and telecommunications equipment all operating at a variety of schedules. Resolving this kind of problem starts with standardized queries. Where is the problem? Has something changed? When did it change? Why did it change? How do changes in the facility overlap? Fms must optimize communication between the affected parties and the electrical staff if they expect to solve the problem. If facility staff members suspect an electrical conflict, the next step is to use electrical measurement tools (either to capture what’s happening inside the equipment or to investigate what is going on with the signal itself when the problem occurs). In this circumstance, the electrician will look for the largest load in the vicinity, listen to the way equipment is operating, inspect the connections, and connect their power logger.

Emergency Backup Power

Fms have final responsibility for keeping the lights on. They might not be directly responsible for the electrical systems, but it definitely helps to understand priorities. In facilities such as hospitals, data centers, banks, and public transportation spaces, maintaining constant power is absolutely critical for managers. Other facilities are required to test their power supply for risk assessments or insurer requirements. Fortunately, utility power in most of the United States is very reliable. However, like all systems, there are occasional failures in the utility power supply. When it comes to electrical power, even the shortest interruption has the potential to cause big problems. The most effective maintenance approach for fms is to test the backup power system regularly, following the guidelines in NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 110 Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems. Backup systems are usually comprised of diesel generators and UPS (Uninterruptable Power Supplies) units that provide temporary, instantaneous power to the most critical loads. Like any system, backup power is only as reliable as its weakest link; testing discovers where that link is. Generators rely on batteries for startup power, and those batteries gradually weaken over time. Other potential failure points are the equipment controlling the generator and the mechanical parts of the generator set. Many manufacturers recommend exercising the generator set at least once a month for a minimum of 30 minutes loaded to 30% of the generator’s capacity. Fms should have the electrician monitor the generator’s output voltage, output current, and frequency during the monthly test. There’s also a trend where, as electronic loads within facilities increase, the backup system failure rate also increases. This is due to the way in which the electronic loads take power from the system: these gulps of power change frequently—and at a frequency that is not the standard 60Hz the generator typically uses. Electricians can identify this by measuring voltage, current, and frequency.

Electrical Power Systems In Older Facilities

Maintaining electrical systems in older facilities provides additional challenges to standard daily work. The older part of the facility may be on the list of upgrades, but today’s right now problems will always take priority. Older power systems were designed to support standard motors and incandescent lighting, not the electronics discussed earlier. Modern distorting loads operate differently: 100 Amps consumed by modern loads affects the system differently than 100 Amps consumed by older equipment. The modern 100 Amp demand may create harmonics, which in turn causes conductors and transformers to overheat. This heating effect is exacerbated by the smaller electrical service rooms in older facilities where heat is not easily dissipated. Older electrical systems also commonly still have neutral conductors that are only half the size of phase conductors. If the loads operating on those circuits contain significant harmonic loads or the loads are not balanced, the neutral can quickly overheat (due to higher neutral currents) and, in the worst case, burn the neutral conductor out. The latest electrical codes account for these effects and describe appropriate upgrades. If the older part of the facility can’t be upgraded, then performing load studies on the older circuits is a good way for fms to ensure safe, reliable operation. The changing needs of the facility’s electrical power system should be considered as a whole, not just at the individual office, equipment, or circuit level. Fms must incorporate communication between teams, take standard electrical measurements on a regular basis, and test critical backup systems. If electronic building controls are here to stay, then managing power reliability issues should become part of standard facilities operations. Frank Healy Healy is power quality marketing manager for Fluke Corporation, where he has advised and consulted on many aspects of instrumentation for electrical engineering, including installation testing, earth/ground testing, and power, for more than 20 years. He started his career as a hospital engineer in the UK.

Other posts by

Leave a Comment

» Comments RSS Feed